Management Effects on Soil Organic Carbon Pools

Oct 20, 2014 • By Rebecca Graham, Rahan Ghimire, Stephen Machado

Everything is built on soil; the food we eat, the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the clothing we wear on our backs. Interactions in the soil between components like microbes, insects, water, plant roots, soil organic matter, minerals, and air make it more than just filth we scrape off our boots. Because of all of these interactions, soil has the ability to mitigate for or to contribute to  global climate change--which makes it so fascinating to study.

Soil Organic Carbon Storage

Soil has the potential to store three times more carbon than the atmosphere. However, more than half of the stored soil organic carbon (SOC) has been lost in the last century due to soil disturbance. Understanding the factors that regulate SOC loss can help predict ecosystem responses to climate change.

Soil organic carbon is composed of an array of C compounds that are in varying states of decomposition. Measurement of sensitive fractions of SOC like particulate organic carbon (POC) and potentially mineralizeable carbon (PMC) can help scientists understand changes in total SOC, which is less responsive to changes in management practices.

What did I do as a REACCH summer intern?

As a REACCH summer research intern, I studied SOC for nine weeks at theColumbia Basin Agricultural Research Center (CBARC) in beautiful Pendleton, Oregon. There, I endeavored to determine how SOC pools change with tillage and soil fertility management practices in wheat-fallow cropping systems, which are prevalent in the Pacific Northwest.

I measured POC and PMC, in the winter wheat-summer fallow tillage fertility long term (TF-LT) plots at CBARC.  These plots were tilled with a moldboard plow, a subsurface sweep and an offset disc consistently since 1940. Plow leaves no surface residue and inverts the soil, disc leaves a moderate amount and mixes the residue with soil, and sweep leaves the most surface residue. Samples were taken from 0-10 cm depth in plots that received either 0 or 80 pounds of nitrogen per acre under each tillage system.

Particulate Organic Carbon

These measurements came from soil initially collected in 2010. Total carbon (C) was measured using a combustion C:N analyzer. Particulate organic matter was separated by using the method described by Cambardella and Elliott in 1992 and remaining C content was measured using a combustion C:N analyzer. Results:  Nitrogen application did not significantly affect the amount of carbon in the soil (Figs. 1, 2).


Figure 1. Total carbon was significantly higher with sweep and disc than with plow.


Figure 2. Offset disc lost the most POC in the top 10cm

Potentially Mineralizable Organic Carbon

Soil samples were collected during summer 2014 from the TF-LT plots using a soil probe. Soil samples were also taken from the grass pasture, which has not been tilled since 1931, with a soil probe tractor.

Approximately 22g soil samples were incubated for ten days to estimate PMC. Samples were placed in 50ml beakers and then in 1L mason jars. Those were stored in a dark cabinet at room temperature. COwas extracted using a syringe on day 1, 6, and 10 and measured using a gas chromatograph (GC). Total carbon in these samples was also measured.

We used the total CO2 data collected from the mason jars during the ten day incubation period as a proxy to estimate the amount of PMC in the soil. The first day of incubation had the largest flux of COfrom the soil and it decreased as the experiment continued.Results. Plow is the most destructive and had the lowest amount of PMC. Grass pasture had about 2.5 times more PMC than the fields tilled with sweep and about 8 times more than plow tillage. Grass pasture still had about double PMC than the plowed fields (Figs. 3, 4).  


Figure 3. PMC content was the highest in the grass pasture, lowest with plow tillage, and N had little effect on the overall trends.


Figure 4.The data was normalized after factoring in the total amount of carbon with the PMC. Plow tillage still had the greatest loss of PMC. Grass pasture still had about double PMC than the plowed fields.

Conclusions and Looking Forward

Undisturbed grassland stores the largest amount of SOC and PMC, and would lose the most with soil disturbance. Tillage drives COloss from the soil, and is probably more significant than other types of changes to the natural system. Synthetic N fertilizer has little effect on C retention in wheat-fallow systems because of low biomass production.

Converting from pastureland or no-tillage fields to intensively tilled systems will accelerate SOC loss. However, if we were to convert from plowed cropland to grass pasture, we could potentially store three times more total carbon in the soil than under conventionally tilled wheat-fallow systems. The grass pasture at CBARC, after 83 years without disturbance, is now storing a significant amount of carbon.

More research is needed to better understand the effect climate change is having on soil organic matter. With proper management, soils could reverse effects of global climate change, by serving as a sink rather than a source of carbon.

References
Cambardella, C. A. and E. T. Elliott. 1992. Particulate Soil Organic-Matter Changes across a Grassland Cultivation Sequence. SSSAJ. 56:777-783.

REACCH Undergraduate Summer Interns come from all over the country to spend 9 weeks with REACCH scientists conducting research, gaining job and graduate school training, and sharing their experiences. These blogs are the culmination of their research experience. 

Editor: Leigh Bernacchi

Category: 

Location: 

Pendleton
CBARC
Rebecca experiment

Soil samples incubated ten days to estimate PMC

AgClimate Network

If you’re interested in climate and agriculture, continue reading articles at the blog aggregator, AgClimate.net